FANDOM


Alienability Edit

Alienability is a grammatical category highlighting whether a noun’s complement is inherently bound to it, or separable. Often the category is self-evident; where it is not so, the decision can be either arbitrary or indicative of the subject’s opinion on the relationship between noun and complement. Rsiorna demonstrates alienability through two grammatical categories: pronouns and adjectives.

Adjectives Edit

Consider the difference between the following examples:

  1. The hungry child
  2. The human child

The adjective hungry has an alienable relationship to the child; that is to say, it is possible for the child to lose its hunger, namely by eating.

Contrastly, the adjective human has an inalienable relationship to the child; that is to say, it is inherently impossible for the child to lose its human nature.

Pronouns Edit

Alienability through pronouns is demonstrated via choice of grammatical case. The two cases used to demonstrate genitive (possessive) alienability are the accusative and dative cases.

In this instance, consider the difference between desires (alienable) and feet (inalienable):

EN desire foot
RS rsírn poh
EN their desires their feet
RS rsjírn ciatti pioh ciarn

Desires is alienable. It takes the dative case.

Feet is inalienable. It takes the accusative case.

Ad blocker interference detected!


Wikia is a free-to-use site that makes money from advertising. We have a modified experience for viewers using ad blockers

Wikia is not accessible if you’ve made further modifications. Remove the custom ad blocker rule(s) and the page will load as expected.